Dr. Iliana M. Vance
Twenty-two years across multilateral trade policy and institutional governance. Former senior advisor at UNCTAD; PhD International Law, Graduate Institute Geneva.
AIAC operates under a multi-tier governance structure designed to safeguard impartiality, technical rigor and the public interest.
The Executive Team carries day-to-day responsibility for accreditation, compliance, partnerships and standards under the oversight of the Board of Trustees.
Twenty-two years across multilateral trade policy and institutional governance. Former senior advisor at UNCTAD; PhD International Law, Graduate Institute Geneva.
Leads the accreditation assessment function. Background in ISO/IEC 17011 audits across financial-sector certification bodies in Africa, Europe and the Gulf.
Heads AML/CFT oversight and surveillance. Former regional compliance officer for a tier-one correspondent bank; FATF mutual-evaluation contributor.
Coordinates reciprocity, mutual-recognition and joint-assessment programmes with regulators, central banks and multilateral institutions.
Custodians of AIAC's independence, mandate and long-term institutional integrity. Responsible for governance policy, financial stewardship and the appointment of senior officers.
Reviews assessment files and issues final accreditation determinations. Operates under strict separation from the assessment teams that prepare candidate dossiers.
Develops and maintains AIAC's accreditation criteria, ensuring alignment with international frameworks and emerging risk in trade and investment systems.
Independent function responsible for AML / CTF oversight, conflicts management, complaints handling and continuous monitoring of accredited entities.
The Governance Council advises the Board on institutional independence, ethical conduct and the public-interest implications of accreditation decisions.
The Advisory Board contributes specialist input to the Standards Committee and the Accreditation Council. Members serve in their personal capacity.
No commercial, political or sectoral interest may influence accreditation decisions.
Assessment, decision and monitoring functions are structurally separated.
Annual transparency reports detail caseloads, outcomes and material decisions.